You can teach the science of horticulture, ~sort of, except maybe soil science. And you can teach the basics of the Golden Triangle. Beyond that, beauty is in the eye of the beholder and some people will be forever blind. Not because they can't recite the rules of balance and harmony, but because they see a horse of a different color. What is artfully done and dramatic to one can be clumsy and unappealing to another. Bunjin being a prime example.
How many of the great masters of art died poor verses those who were recognized in their lifetime? The number of people who could make a living or even break even in bonsai depends upon the marketplace and the number of possible customers. It will be a a part-time endeavor at best for the great majority of interested parties and very few will have the tenacity
and financial strength to meddle through. Need I say more?
[/QUOT
Saying
less may be better.
Most of the above is vague. Bonsai is all about balance and harmony. So, the styles that use a strongly offset balance or erratic line are still balanced and harmonious, or they would fall over.
Without aesthetic principles, how do you teach others about art, discuss, innovate, disrupt the current paradigm, etc. Anyone who does bonsai needs to understand basic art principles or they can’t do bonsai.
Thank you ALL for your contributions to this thread. It almost stayed drama free. My sincere hope is to be candid about this bonsai educational system we have (for lack of a better term) and what might be done to improve experiences for both student and teacher.
One final point I’d like to bring up. Has anyone in ABS, BCI, or other organizations in North America ever considered providing clubs content for beginners vetted by a panel of seasoned pros? There are quiet, talented people in the bonsai world that do a great job. Still learning from them.
Going to speak in generalizations below:
These 501c3’s are often poorly run and broke. Bonsai is not a cheap hobby. This is why I won’t travel in part to clubs. I have profound respect for the poor planners who are squeezing dimes to share their love of this art.
Perhaps a small handbook titled “So You Got Stuck with Program Director” or something. Volunteer organizations should not fully control the actions of professionals brought in to teach them. Everyone asked me why I drove everywhere; then the locals cannot keep you at a bar for 4 hours to tell them stories about Japan. Volunteers decide the program, pick material, schedule the time of year, etc. Then a pro shows up to make chicken salad out of chicken
. This is an inherently flawed system. A lot of people do ask what I’d prefer to do. The 3 hour talk by a pro on a Friday evening after just arriving before 2-3 workshops on Saturday with all meals with local club or board members then an evening demo. Sunday, more events, treasurer never shows, then drive or fly to next city. How much would that cost in the normal world to hire a consultant / pro? Since everyone seems to like using plumbers for this debate, I’d say a 2 day 3 night out of state plumber for an involved project would cost at least 8k; as opposed to $600 / day plus travel (that’s with degree, Japan study time, all the work for mentors, and committing to being available to travel. Risky as it gets.