CIA Confirms Russia Interfered in USA Election

Going back to my first post, I generally don't comment on threads like these because nothing is ever accomplished. In other words, I don't see a lot of utility in these types of conversations. I'm not trying to strictly disprove anything you're saying. I'm just presenting an alternative stance to what you're suggesting - simply that you shouldn't take the CIA's public "confirmation" through a new outlet's article as proof of anything definitive.

I think you're reading too much into what I'm saying. To mirror what you said in your reply - I guess there's no point in continuing the conversation...EXCEPT sometimes its interesting to carry on conversations without insulting or arguing moral positions on topics. I'm not suggesting you're insulting me, but this thread certainly is negative. Just an observation - you see no point in carrying on the discussion when it's civilized, but respond in volumes when you interpret someone is insulting you. Shouldn't it be the other way around? Again, no offense meant, just an observation from this head and others.
Has nothing to do with being civilized or not civilized... there quite literally is no point. I mean you are putting forth the discussion, that I shouldn't take quite literally a link I posted that says the CIA Confirms that Russia was behind behind a hack. Now we all know there was a hack... so, I guess we are not debating this... Which only leads then to the part about the CIA saying it was Russia. One could say we are debating it being Russia... but really it doesn't matter who it is does it, seeing that it still was done and should not of happened... So, in the end we are now just left with the fact that the CIA said it... and said they have evidence of it...

Now, no one here has any actual evidence to support their findings are inccorrect... and so, we are just left with a dumb discussion of me having to defend myself over nothing.

Some one can say, anything they would like... for instance, you shouldn't just take stuff at face value, or you shouldn't believe all that you hear, or believe what it is the CIA said... or call stuff conspiracy theories ... which other than the nonsense of people just throwing out stuff because of their own personal feelings towards them... I got noting to debate for or against ... to try and defend my position, do I?

I mean there is no evidence as I mentioned that what they said is wrong... so, I can only I guess debate whether or not you should like them, or not... which I don't frankly care.

You get the right I guess, to base a duscussion on just some stuff out of thin air, and I have to somehow, with actual evidence... show how I am not looking gullible, by posting up a link and starting a duscussion, on a story that just about every news media company is running with... I would post up other links of the numerous other respectable security companies and teams that have found the same evidence and have come to the very same conclusion... but, woud have to post up a link from a media source... and as we all know, here again the media lies, and Trump says it wasn't Russia and it didn't happen... More stuff out of thin air.
 
Last edited:
Just in case you are still seeing what I post this is odd: Stacey you wrote,----Now, no one here has any actual evidence to support their findings are inccorrect... and so, we are just left with a dumb discussion of me having to defend myself over nothing. You're the one who started this wee wee for distance contest didn't you?
CIA Confirms Russia Interfered in USA Election
 
YESSS they are. They are all liberal douce bags that are endanger of loosing their jobs as Trump starts draining the swamp. Some of these people will stop at nothing to continue their agenda, some because this is the only decent job they can get with their limited skill sets and others because they are true ideologues.
 
This one is interesting as well! Thank god there are at least some on the right who have at least a bit of common sense in trying to preserve the dignity of the United States.

Sad part about this post and the last one I posted, is you know there is some Clown out there that is probably saying all this is just some partisan BS... all aimed at just being mean to pour Trump and his supporters... Freaking idiots!

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/...hacking-cannot-become-a-partisan-issue-232475
 
Last edited:
That's the Ohomo socialist Hitlery loving CIA. Not a genuine Constitutional CIA. Seems just a few days ago it was confirmed that there was NO interference. Being as how Mr Trump is an outsider, independent and a danger to the status quo and the NWO they are getting desperate to discredit him and put Hitlery in control. May the fail miserably!
 
I saw a post on reddit explaining why Russia might have favored a Trump presidency:




It's easy to see why putin likes trump, and why trump is anti EPA.

Putin loves trump because trump is all about big oil and clean coal (if there is such a thing)

ExxonMobileUSA and russia currently have a agreement to share oil from a new site in the arctic circle. This location was previously covered in ICE, and unsuitable for drilling.

Due to global warming over the past 50 years, the ice in the arctic circle is quickly melting, and thus opened this spot where oil was found.

Russia has a claim to the land, but only ExxonMobile USA has the technology to extract the oil out of these desolate conditions.

This Exxon/Russia deal was put on hold due to USA Sanctions against russia for their activities in Ukraine. Russia needs money, their economy crashed last year. They need the arctic circle deal.

Enter Trump: Trump appoints ExxonMobile CEO Tellar as Secretary of State, and also nominates Scott Pruitte, a staunch opponent of the EPA over the years, and who currently has 3 lawsuits against the EPA over coal regulations.

Trump is aiming to strip the EPA of it's power and agenda, un-do the Arctic Circle sanctions, Teller, Pruitt, Putin, Trump all stand to make a lot of money.

The human race will pay for trump's choices in the end.. Coal factories will start back up, Solar power will see regulation (we can't have customers selling energy), and our environment will continue to get warmer. All of this to make a buck, and to ensure your rich share-holders continue to get those famous EXXON Dividends.
 
After 9/11 we looked into who attacked us...

No we most certainly did not.

Cussing at Vance and calling him old is small.

______

We need to wake up.

They joked on the radio a month or so back that Russia is going to replace the Middle East as our fear factor.

He we Fucking go!


You ever program a robot?

Haha!

If you listen to the media, you HAVE BEEN PROGRAMMED.


ONE QUESTION....

What the fuck are militias waiting for?

An invitation?

We are too far gone.

Sorce

 
No we most certainly did not.

Cussing at Vance and calling him old is small.

______

We need to wake up.

They joked on the radio a month or so back that Russia is going to replace the Middle East as our fear factor.

He we Fucking go!


You ever program a robot?

Haha!

If you listen to the media, you HAVE BEEN PROGRAMMED.


ONE QUESTION....

What the fuck are militias waiting for?

An invitation?

We are too far gone.

Sorce
You raise up militias you are raising the civil war scenario. Good God who wants to go there? You want to talk about conspiracies, I have seen several videos showing large White Suvs with the United nations logo on them. What's that all about? Of course this may not be true and nothing more than just another phone news story. The accompanying story is to support the idea of a UN army here to support Obama when he declares Martial law. This is what a lot of these groups think will happen. Who knows, but I am not going to put forward something that I cannot prove is a fact to you as a fact.
 
(Hi,

I don't want to take part in this discussion, and don't want to post in a thread that I hope is now defunct, but this article might be interesting I think. I'm not a subscriber of the New scientist, so I haven't read the whole article. Yet, I think that it can be a good start for an unbiased reflection. It isbased not on political, or religious beliefs, it's a scientific look at reality.

https://www.newscientist.com/articl...ecWk2-Xmas-Amazing&utm_content=Amazing1&cmpid

Take it for what it is, a parenthesis in this thread. Please don't reply to my message, and continue your discussion without me: I don't mean to throw gasoline on the flames, on the contrary, I hope it is just food for thought, but everyone's free to be a vegan or a meat eater, that's not the problem here.)
 
I think your humor is a prediction of the future for you. I don't think that many of you realize we are in the middle of a cold war version of a civil war. You have to ask yourselves what side do you want to wind up on and what do you think the country will look like when it's done. I have said it before but I will keep saying it. Despite all of the rhetoric spewed by the left to tell whoever will listen, either by choice or by force, how violent these racists biggots and homophobes on the right are and how un-American they are blah--blah.

All you have to do is look at the evidence in your face. Who is rioting in the streets? Who is assaulting and beating supporters of a political idea they don't like, who is it that is busting out windows, burning and destroying cars, looting businesses they have broken into? Who has caused for anyone on the opposing side exercising their freedom of speech, their freedom of religion, and freedom of assembly, to gather peaceably and lest we forget---killing cops??????? THE LEFT !! THAT'S WHO. Is this who you are? Is this how you want to exercise your citizenship?
 
Back
Top Bottom