Going back to my first post, I generally don't comment on threads like these because nothing is ever accomplished. In other words, I don't see a lot of utility in these types of conversations. I'm not trying to strictly disprove anything you're saying. I'm just presenting an alternative stance to what you're suggesting - simply that you shouldn't take the CIA's public "confirmation" through a new outlet's article as proof of anything definitive.
I think you're reading too much into what I'm saying. To mirror what you said in your reply - I guess there's no point in continuing the conversation...EXCEPT sometimes its interesting to carry on conversations without insulting or arguing moral positions on topics. I'm not suggesting you're insulting me, but this thread certainly is negative. Just an observation - you see no point in carrying on the discussion when it's civilized, but respond in volumes when you interpret someone is insulting you. Shouldn't it be the other way around? Again, no offense meant, just an observation from this head and others.
Has nothing to do with being civilized or not civilized... there quite literally is no point. I mean you are putting forth the discussion, that I shouldn't take quite literally a link I posted that says the CIA Confirms that Russia was behind behind a hack. Now we all know there was a hack... so, I guess we are not debating this... Which only leads then to the part about the CIA saying it was Russia. One could say we are debating it being Russia... but really it doesn't matter who it is does it, seeing that it still was done and should not of happened... So, in the end we are now just left with the fact that the CIA said it... and said they have evidence of it...
Now, no one here has any actual evidence to support their findings are inccorrect... and so, we are just left with a dumb discussion of me having to defend myself over nothing.
Some one can say, anything they would like... for instance, you shouldn't just take stuff at face value, or you shouldn't believe all that you hear, or believe what it is the CIA said... or call stuff conspiracy theories ... which other than the nonsense of people just throwing out stuff because of their own personal feelings towards them... I got noting to debate for or against ... to try and defend my position, do I?
I mean there is no evidence as I mentioned that what they said is wrong... so, I can only I guess debate whether or not you should like them, or not... which I don't frankly care.
You get the right I guess, to base a duscussion on just some stuff out of thin air, and I have to somehow, with actual evidence... show how I am not looking gullible, by posting up a link and starting a duscussion, on a story that just about every news media company is running with... I would post up other links of the numerous other respectable security companies and teams that have found the same evidence and have come to the very same conclusion... but, woud have to post up a link from a media source... and as we all know, here again the media lies, and Trump says it wasn't Russia and it didn't happen... More stuff out of thin air.