It would have been helpful if he had said he was doing the 10 day technique at the beginning.
I would like to see a follow up photo of the tree several weeks later. He mentioned several times that he gets new buds (shoots) from between the needles that he leaves behind. If that's true, then it's because he's removed the adventitious buds.I thought it was a good introduction to new shoot removal. I don't like the use of the word candle here. Candles are candles and mature shoots are mature shoots. This can be confusing to beginners.
Adair, I disagree that he removed any adventitious buds by removing the shoots at the base. How is that possible when you are only removing the currant growth which has no buds at it's base? The buds come from the previous season's growth which is not touched. If you're referring to removing multiple shoots all emerging from one spot, there may be a little 1 year old wood removed but cutting them off individually will lead to too many buds forming anyway so I think it's ok to do it this way.
Actually, you can combine the two.I've watched this video before and I think he showing how to decandle pine pretty much the same as others. Decandle pine is no rocket science as there are only two ways of doing it.... All in one go or ten days apart. Cutting shoot is pretty much the same... Cut them of at the base of the current year growth. You leave a little more stub on the strong shoot if you do all in one go. That's it.
And/or he cut into prior year's growth vs. at the axil, where current year's candles began; which may be what you meant by "removed the adventitious buds".He mentioned several times that he gets new buds (shoots) from between the needles that he leaves behind. If that's true, then it's because he's removed the adventitious buds.
Yes. He says he cuts right at the base, and he says he "pushes a little more", which if he means that he actually removes a little more, then yes he is cutting into last year's wood. Which would remove the adventitious buds.And/or he cut into prior year's growth vs. at the axil, where current year's candles began; which may be what you meant by "removed the adventitious buds".
I'd say the video is directionally correct, but pretty rough...in many ways.
With respect, you need to acquaint yourself with exactly what adventitious buds are Adair. The new buds (shoots) he gets ARE adventitious.I would like to see a follow up photo of the tree several weeks later. He mentioned several times that he gets new buds (shoots) from between the needles that he leaves behind. If that's true, then it's because he's removed the adventitious buds.
On places where multiple shoots are extending, what is happening is that the primary bud is growing, and that area is so strong adventitious buds are growing, too. By going back and cutting them off in "one cut" where they are connected, that tissue that connects the two shoots is the area where the adventitious buds are. So, he's removing the adventitious buds.
Michael, I've watched it twice. He says he gets new shoots from in between the pairs of needles that he leaves on. That means he gets "needle" buds (shoots).With respect, you need to acquaint yourself with exactly what adventitious buds are Adair. The new buds (shoots) he gets ARE adventitious.
You may be correct - in the literal scientific sense. I don't know. Frankly, I don't know what half the words you used actually mean! (That's due to my ignorance of the proper biological terms.)Michael is correct. Your definition of adventitious is a bit narrow Adair. If the bud is coming from the needle axil the bud is adventitious. Periderm formation usually cuts off the meristem, which is why we don't often get coppice growth from conifers. Some conifers have persistent detached meristems and will allow this. If we chop off the orthotropic leader we can usually induce an adventitious bud from the axil of relatively new growth, which is what we are talking about here. Heck, sometimes you get a surprise, I've even seen epicormic growth from chopped black pine trunks! Is your way better Adair? It may be, but I'm guessing to determine that it would be proper to contact the person in the video and ask them directly what they meant or were trying to convey.
Joe,ad·ven·ti·tious
ˌadvenˈtiSHəs/
adjective
- happening or carried on according to chance rather than design or inherent nature.
"my adventures were always adventitious, always thrust on me"
synonyms: unplanned, unpremeditated, accidental, chance, fortuitous, serendipitous, coincidental, casual, random
"he felt that the conversation was not entirely adventitious"
- coming from outside; not native.
"the adventitious population"
synonyms: unplanned, unpremeditated, accidental, chance, fortuitous, serendipitous, coincidental, casual, random
"he felt that the conversation was not entirely adventitious"- BIOLOGY
formed accidentally or in an unusual anatomical position.
"propagation of sour cherries by adventitious shoots"
Anthony,Hmm, buds that spontaneously erupt on branches or buds that pass through the centres of needles ?
So you shorten the branch and leave a few needles to allow for buds.
And the branch system gets longer.
Or back buds appear and you can somewhat control your branch lengthening. No need for grafts.
Or you do both and the sunlight aids in the back budding.
BUT the extended candles that became branches with functioning needles feeds the tree/branch and
makes a healthier tree.
Additionally, it takes much more elongation of the branch with candles gone to needles to fatten the branch.
So you end up with health and no real branch fattening, retaining one's elegant design.
Alas it has to grown tested.
UNLESS someone has done it already ----------- anyone, anyone ?
Good Year
Anthony
* Write to the Author of the Video ----------- most excellent idea .