Is bonsai art? - inspired by BVF

[1] Playing, and enjoying himself with friends, as it is meant to be
[2] a doodle
[3] The camera has but one eye, so the image is flat and is just a photograph.
However he can take it back to his darkroom and manipulate it somewhat, so it becomes a better photograph/

Why do folk pay more for the Sperm of an Artist / Research Scientist
Because they have the gene for True Creativity and a link to Genius.

Why do folk call themselves artists ------------------ a desire to be seen as a genius.
And spend no $$$$$$$$
 
[1] Playing, and enjoying himself with friends, as it is meant to be
[2] a doodle
[3] The camera has but one eye, so the image is flat and is just a photograph.
However he can take it back to his darkroom and manipulate it somewhat, so it becomes a better photograph/

Why do folk pay more for the Sperm of an Artist / Research Scientist
Because they have the gene for True Creativity and a link to Genius.

Why do folk call themselves artists ------------------ a desire to be seen as a genius.
And spend no $$$$$$$$
1. A professional athlete can enjoy himself with friends also, in a sport game. But they get payed millions cause they have far superior physical attribute than an average person.
2. The end product of a doodle is an ART WORK.
3. I digress. Anybody can just point and click. But a true photographer do have a composition and a story behind the image.

Folks calls themselves artists cause they are better in the art field than the average person. Just as professional athletes are far superior physically than the average person. Can a regulat dude carve out "Son of Laocoon"? Nope!
 
BTW, for anyone interested in a more academically-inclined answer from me about whether or not bonsai is an art, I find - via a search of my name and "Aristotle," - that my input into this matter still exists on this site in a thread found in the General Discussion forum started by Chris Johnston, Oct 10, 2007! It still contains one of my attempts to sort this matter out via Aristotilian logic (perhaps with a nod to Plato's take on logic, which I often throw in for counterbalance in the "Is bonsai art?" wars here and else where). Don't know how I can link it here directly, but a search can probably get you there. :)
 
Sawgrass I have seen your work that you have posted here and it is quite beautiful and shows extreme skill. Having said that I have a great deal of trouble connecting your worldview (as expressed in many many posts) with this beauty, therefore I have no idea what your inner being has to do with your Bonsai. So I guess I can't call your stuff art based on your definition.
BTW: I would not call any of my stuff art because I do not consider myself an artist.

My relationship with Bonsai is this:
I am not a religious person but I believe there is a God the creator or force that we all exist under. When my trees are having problems I blame myself. When they burst forth with life and are healthy due to my ministrations, I thank GOD. What they look like is sometimes pleasing
and often frustrating, but thats what makes me want to get up each morning to see what, if anything, God has wrought (to coin a phrase) in his cathederal.

So there you have it.
A_E
 
I agree it is art. Unfortunately, my art and bonsai ability is relegated to stick figures! :(
 
Grouper52,

research back into the Chinese Penjing showed Tree Penjing being used for inspiration by Ancient
Chinese Scholars.
Nothing more.

All of this Art crap follows the --------------- what is the difference between craft and Art - $$$$$
The potters on ClayArt explained this back in 98 or so.

At the end of the day all you are looking for is someone to sell it all to, when you get too old
and it's art of course.
This is not a discussion it is a bunch of folk wanting their investment back at the end of the day.
Good Day
Anthony
 
I don't mind giving the title of art to a persons creations or the title of artist to one who inspires those designs.
My self worth is not lessened by that.
I recently went to get a haircut. When picking up my daughter I said let's go- we are going to the hair doctor. This person is a stylist and maybe an artist to me.
I guess I've just chosen to include art in everything I see.
I rather enjoy seeing things that way.
 
If you get up in the morning and go about being concerned about what you consider to be art, then it is art----to you---- and what someone else thinks does not matter. You may be the only person in the civilized or uncivilized world that views what you do as art,----it is in the end art to you. Someone may argue against your art and be compelling in the argument but still to you it is art and they don't have a right to try and convince you otherwise. They only right they really have is the right to like or dislike what you do and that conclusion or position does not diminish what you do or elevate what you do not, nor does it elevate their personal opinion of your efforts. In the end longevity will carry the argument.
 
Last edited:
CRAFT

Artisans create craft, viewers and peer review deem it art.
This is so simple and it's all that needs to be said. The thread could've ended here.
Thank you.
 
I see that you cannot say you are an artist.
Only others can say that.
But you can be inspired to create by everything around you. ❤️
 
LOL! It may interest you to know that my day job for the past 30+ years is as a board certified psychiatrist - and yes, you have hit the nail on the head, and that was my intent in writing the question. At this time in this culture 90% of everything is about narcissism, and our enfeebled underlying self-esteem demands that we be special folks. If we be doing bonsai, it bloody well better be an art, and we bloody well better be thought of by others and ourselves as "Artists"! (No accident that my album is named "Trees of a Hobbyist.")
True, the same reason you included 30 years and 'board certified' in your response :)
 
Psychobabble is often it's own reward. I have found that those who try to shut down discussions on art, or critique art, or judge art are the same that don't posses the ability to produce it.
 
It took me a long time to get this- because I'm stubborn and I've seen too many beautiful trees not to consider this art.
But of course not all paintings become art- but to someone they may be. That was a difficult thread for me. At first I was mad about it.
I kept thinking back to the people who's trees I admire and of course to me they are artists.
How dare someone remove that title from them :)
But they still remain artists to me.
Many of them participate here.
I hope I don't offend them in the future by calling them artists or cause them to get a complex which causes their head to swell.
 
I honestly can't see anyone taking offense in what another labels them for working on trees. There are many labels to different people...to take offense is a shallow response to a compliment.
 
Psychobabble is often it's own reward. I have found that those who try to shut down discussions on art, or critique art, or judge art are the same that don't posses the ability to produce it.

Depends on what those who "possess the ability to produce it" use that ability to produce eg "p*ss Christ" or the Madonna with elephant dung all over it. Or maybe such outstanding works with incredibly deep meaning as "White on White" that hangs in the MOMA in NY. or much of the drivel in the Guggenheim (in NY). Or maybe it is Caravaggios "The Flagellation of Christ" which is about 20 feet tall. I saw it at the Caravaggio exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum of Art.Imagine my stunned reaction when I looked up at the painting and saw a perfect likness of myself as the person depicted doing the flagellating (the guy on the right). I could not get out of that room fast enough. that was about 25 years ago when my hair was still black.
300px-Caravaggio_-_La_Flagellazione_di_Cristo.jpg
I don't know if it is art, but I sure got an emotional response from it.

A_E
 
Depends on what those who "possess the ability to produce it" use that ability to produce eg "p*ss Christ" or the Madonna with elephant dung all over it. Or maybe such outstanding works with incredibly deep meaning as "White on White" that hangs in the MOMA in NY. or much of the drivel in the Guggenheim (in NY). Or maybe it is Caravaggios "The Flagellation of Christ" which is about 20 feet tall. I saw it at the Caravaggio exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum of Art.Imagine my stunned reaction when I looked up at the painting and saw a perfect likness of myself as the person depicted doing the flagellating (the guy on the right). I could not get out of that room fast enough. that was about 25 years ago when my hair was still black.
300px-Caravaggio_-_La_Flagellazione_di_Cristo.jpg
I don't know if it is art, but I sure got an emotional response from it.

A_E
Ever try Beano?
 
BTW, for anyone interested in a more academically-inclined answer from me about whether or not bonsai is an art, I find - via a search of my name and "Aristotle," - that my input into this matter still exists on this site in a thread found in the General Discussion forum started by Chris Johnston, Oct 10, 2007! It still contains one of my attempts to sort this matter out via Aristotilian logic (perhaps with a nod to Plato's take on logic, which I often throw in for counterbalance in the "Is bonsai art?" wars here and else where). Don't know how I can link it here directly, but a search can probably get you there. :)
Hey Grouper. ..
Glad to see you back. Was sad to hear you had sold off your trees. I always liked them and found them inspirational, as well always appreciated that you took the time to message me regarding to tell me you appreciated mine. That was really cool of you and in a lot of ways I think the style of our individual trees was very similar. And I know you were greatly inspired at the time by Dan... who personally out of the west coast movement going on at the present... I ferl is probably the most talented out of the lot and sadly is just not recognize at much as he should be, at least in my opinion. .. in comparison to the rest.

I do have a couple of things I would like to throw by you and ask your thoughts... and perhaps you can better help me understand?

The first being the concept going on within this thread of if one calls oneself an Artist... they are somehow a narcissist?

This I find confussing...

Why? Because, from my own perspective I am not actually calling myself an Artist, because I think I am somehow better than others... Quite the contrary... we have gone down this road time after time with multiple discussions regarding the subject... and time after time I have actually stated, that seems to always be missed... perhaps through a willingness of some? Who knows... that being an Artist is not actually something that necessarily involves some great skill, or some great talent... that in fact anyone can actually be an Artist... and that this is evident in the vast majority of the Art that is out there... where often some of the creators of the work, knew very little about skill and had actually very little in the way of talent.

That I call my self an Artist. .. why? Because this is quite literally what I am and what I do...

As I have stated... it is my opinion that what defines someone being an Artist from someone doing a craft... is the willingness in my view, to show the craft in such a way where one is trying to intervene their own personal thoughts, feelings, emotions, etc. of their view of the world in what it is they are creating.

This is what I do daily... with the items I create daily... I am always asking myself what it is I want to show within the piece of Art I am doing. When I get people that come to me and ask me to paint a picture or a Scroll for them... they come to me for one reason... they like that often I usually approach what ever subject they are wanting... let's say a bird... in such a way, that even though they have seen paintings of birds five million times... I have somehow managed to now show a bird in a different way. And usually tell me after... that this is why they came to me.

Now to get back to the narcissist question...
I have not said that I have done anything special. As well, as I have mentioned... I have not said their was any special talent or skill...

In fact... I have not actually said anything!

Which is where the problem apparently lies, with me not fully understanding not only a lot of the discussion going on here... nor why you perhaps and some others might refer to one doing as what I am doing as being a narcissist?

I mean... this does not quite add up?
Right?

So, if I have said yes... anyone can actually do Art... anyone can actually be an Artist... that it does not take some special skill, no special talent... that the only thing it takes is a willingness to interject one's own identity into their work... which here again.. Absolutely Anyone Can Do?

What are people fighting?
Me telling them that they can as well, do Art, and that they themselves can be an Artist?
If so... this is just about the most rediculous thing I think I have ever heard.

My next question...

If I have not actually said anything. .. as I mentioned before... than perhaps you could explain to me how I somehow would have the problem of thinking I was somehow better than people... when again I did not say anything?

Actually... strike that... I did say something just now... that they could do it as well.

So my question would be the following... it has been said as well regarding these comments ... that there seems to be some problem with people wanting to call themselves Artist, being insecure...

Yet, if you go back and look through the 8 pages of posts... what you actually find is that the people wanting to call themselves Artist... don't actually seem to be the one's having this problem.

They are not the one's writing the silly thoughts of how others think they are better than anyone else... they are not the one's telling people that they want to just call themselves Artist so they can not actually work and just live off of rich people... and that their work can only be considered Art if it has hung in a gallery for centuries, or even that their work cannot actually be considered Art... unless a group of their peers says it is so... as though it is somehow up to these same people to decide when and where Art can become so?

So, my question would be... what would you clinically call people who say others have a insecurity problem... when in fact it is just the opposite?

One last thing... I am sorry.. I know this is long, and I apologize.

You mentioned that if anyone was interested in a more "Academically-inclined " explanation of what Art is to check out what you had written...

I mean... if anything posted by anyone here sounds like someone thinking they were better than anyone else... it would be this statement right?

I mean... some of us not so smart people... us common man so to speak. .. might want to think that their reasoning... that their logic of what art might be... might also be worthy of an "Academically-inclined " point of view as well. Right?

The only difference is... that I guess I don't have a chip on my shoulder... that I am not going to hold a personal grudge against someone because they might have a view that differs from myself here...

That I think you are a smart person... a talented person... and just because you are... I will not hold it against you. I will take what you said as you meaning that you have just put a lot of thought into what it was you felt Art was. But, I will say this... you are not alone.
 
Back
Top Bottom