Considering how stubborn this species is with branch ramification, how long do you realistically expect to be developing the tree before you would consider it “show-worthy”? Or is it already a tree you’d be happy to show off as an exhibition? There is a lot I don’t know about this species, and bonsai in general, … and how this species does AS a bonsai… , so please excuse if my comment seems crass.
Interesting question. The branch ramification is coming along pretty well, and I have shown it a couple times at our local club show. I don’t know if it will ever be something I’d show at a higher level just because they are oddball trees in pots.
First, it’s hard to compare ginkgo as a bonsai to how they age in nature, where they actually become majestic-looking trees with good striated bark and graceful branching. As bonsai, the bark doesn’t develop the same way, and the trunks tend to grow as a bulbous mass or a stick. The foliage is almost never in scale, so in leaf, they’re not convincing, and out of leaf, they’re not graceful.
Then, since they do grow different as bonsai, it’s hard to judge them using recognized bonsai aesthetics: radial nebari, mature bark, tapering trunk, graceful ramification, convincing representation of the tree in nature, etc. so they end up being “interesting” in a show, and then basically dismissed.
In addition to that, this tree is on the small side at ~20”. So it doesn’t have big presence compared to a lot of old ginkgo bonsai, which often have a fat trunk, and tall, but coarse branching.
To answer your question, if it was maybe 50-75% bigger and displaying a couple more courses of tertiary branching, I’d consider showing it.
I’d be curious if
@William N. Valavanis or
@MACH5 perceive ginkgo bonsai in shows similarly.