I second that, treat yourself…although I‘d watch your vids with a 90s camera and mic if I had to and still find them addictively perfect.I would say this qualifies to spend big on a 4k camera and a decent microphone
Next to the sort of money is not really worth it to me..I would say this qualifies to spend big on a 4k camera and a decent microphone
you noticed before me!
Hi Jelle, nothing is wrong with your videos, or the sound; it was merely a little joke, don't take it too seriously.Next to the sort of money is not really worth it to me..
As long as youtube keep wrecking video quality, there is absolutely no need for other equipment. It seems that youtube add extre compression to the video thay I upload. They cannot tell what settings to use on the video compression before upload. The quality here is perfect; Thumbnails are made from stills taken from the video. Once on youtube.. not so much. (also I would not know how to handle the files. My laptop has a hard time crunching the source material which runs at ~120Mb/min of recording)
Whats wrong with the sound?
Watched this one the other day, and it really helped me see some potential in some trees that was very uncertain of.and the last styling video
I'm not quite sure yet, I think you need to post even more
Such a sad conclusion to reach.have to be honest: i thought you were rigging your views when you started as it just wasn't possible to have thousands of views in such a short time
I do admit the first day I had 10K views in one day I was a little shockedt just wasn't possible to have thousands of views in such a short time
True. it is one of the things I am convinced needed to be done more.Very few will take the time to film a segment that won't air for 3 to 6 months when you finally work on the tree again.
Viewers obviously notice and appreciate it. I know I do.True. it is one of the things I am convinced needed to be done more.
I hate it to have to find a second video to learn whether something worked.