Can you give me a precise, accurate definition for the term literati bonsai?

Been trying to follow the conversation in this thread but my attention span the last 3 weeks hasn't been good from the meds I am on, lack of sleep and just generally tired.

I can't state a definite definition but I see literati as a long slender, sinuous trunk with most of the foliage coming off the top 3rd of the tree.

I know there are those that say only conifers can make "proper" literati but Id disagree.

I have a BRT that I would consider to be a literati. It needs a trim and might have more foliage than some would consider proper for a literati but I also disagree that it has to be sparse in foliage.
Beautiful tree BTW!!! May healing come your way physically also.
 
I heard Walter Pall say several times that, in his opinion, literati are sort of naturalistic trees. During the workshop with him, when he was standing next to a pine tree which Andrija Zokic later styled, I asked him why he thinks so. You can find some of his ideas about literati in this video, first around the 6-minute mark and then again during the evaluation of the result. Some of the concepts could be valuable for this discussion.
Of course Walter would say it that way!!! He is the king of "naturalistic" trees.
 
After reading the 79 posts of this thread, I must confess I'm not sure if my juniper can (or will ever) qualify as literati. I think some of the rules are followed, but not some others.. Anyway I like it, and at least I have had the chance to "attempt" to it.....

View attachment 624577 View attachment 624578

BTW, this how it looked like 5 years ago after my first styling

View attachment 624580
I would call it literati. It will look forward to seeing you refine it.
 
This is more like it! Thank you @Gabler for initiating the discussion.
This is eye opening not only philosophically but visually.
I love the deciduous or broadleaf literati. I see it in nature. Arbutus is a neat one that will snake through the trees with tufts of healthy foliage at any opening exposed to light.
I am in my own bubble and contemplating the opinions from different corners helps to improve my understanding of bonsai beyond the somewhat narrow definitions in books both old and new.
Here is one where I am not sure, is this cypress literati/bunjin or something else?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4677.jpeg
    IMG_4677.jpeg
    470.2 KB · Views: 30
Hmm… lots of good debate…. One thought

While searching for a meaning of a tree form modeled after trees which actually occur in nature.

In my experience would hazard to recommend one head into the interior of multiple growth forests around the world and look at the scrubby understory trees. Include species which are canopy trees but could never get enough light to grow into the canopy and have been trashed by falling detritus, snow or whatnot over the years. Then mentally bonsai each.

Thinking eventually one might comprehend what this thread is looking to put into words. That said, not sure descriptive ‘rules’ created by bonsai artists could accurately describe the multiplicity of ‘literati’ tree forms which occur in nature. At least this is what years of hiking in forests around the world tell me.

Happy New Year’s!
DSD sends
 
Last edited:
If you goth enough passion, money, health and time, i'd say go for it
For most of us (me included) most accesible is to look (and appreciate) representation of the trees in old paintings ;)

tre.jpg
 
Really good idea!

That’s a nice old pine. I’m sure there are images for other trees. Looks like a template for some of the images in the Mustard Seed Garden Manual

Or… bet there are plenty of images on the internet and YouTube of literati in the wild.

Best
DSD sends
 
was this shared yet?


Part of the excellent video series highlighting individual questions from viewers by bonsai experts from around the world.
Very cool Jelle!

This video is a great gateway folks can enter to begin to understand the large variety of harsh conditions trees can endure in nature.

Cheers
DSD sends
 
After a lot of thought more or less because this thread "maybe" was a response to one of my own.

Thoughts.

Bunjin / Literati Bonsai: An Art-Forward Defense​


Bunjin, or literati bonsai, occupies a unique and often misunderstood place within the bonsai world. Its sparse lines, elongated trunks, and minimal foliage frequently invite questions: is it “finished”? Does it follow conventional rules? Is it correct? From a traditional craft perspective, these questions make sense—but they miss the deeper significance of bunjin as a form of living sculpture and expressive practice.


Seen through an art-forward lens, bunjin is not a compromise or a shortcut. It is a medium for poetic narrative and formal exploration. Each bend, each carefully pruned branch, becomes a gesture. The negative space around the tree is as significant as the living material itself. Every reduction—the absence of foliage, the tension of an exposed branch—is deliberate, intentional, and expressive.




1. Minimalism as Expression​


In conventional bonsai, fullness and balance often dominate visual priorities. In bunjin, the eye is drawn to line, proportion, and movement. Minimalism allows the tree to speak in a visual language akin to drawing or sculpture:


  • A single winding trunk evokes struggle against wind, gravity, or adversity.
  • The placement of each branch creates rhythm and tension, akin to a musical composition.
  • Empty space—the areas intentionally left untouched—carries meaning as much as foliage or wire.

Here, craft and art intersect: horticultural knowledge ensures the tree survives under minimal conditions, but the design decisions transform it into an expressive object.




2. Narrative and Metaphor​


Bunjin functions as a narrative device. Its leaning, contorted trunks suggest movement, endurance, and resilience. Trees tell stories of adversity, solitude, and elegance in imperfection. From an art perspective, the tree is more than a living plant—it is an evolving sculpture, a temporal artwork whose changing form carries both the maker’s hand and the lived experience of the tree itself.




3. Authorship and Intention​


Critics sometimes dismiss bunjin as “random” or “neglectful,” but the apparent simplicity is deceptive. Every pruning cut, every wire placement, every decision to leave or remove a branch is an act of authorial presence. Bunjin demonstrates that art and craft are inseparable: the practitioner’s choices are visible, intentional, and accountable to both the tree and the design.




4. Craft as Foundation for Expression​


Bunjin cannot exist without deep craft knowledge. Understanding water, light, species-specific stress tolerance, and pruning consequences is essential. Art cannot survive without craft: expressive freedom in bunjin is contingent on mastery of the material. Craft is not a limitation; it is the medium that enables the expressive potential of the tree.




5. Perceived Rules and the Illusion of Freedom​


Bunjin is often described as “freeform,” but this is misleading. Its power comes from the manipulation of perceived rules.


There are clear principles: graceful trunk movement, taper, branch flow, and proportional tension. Yet these are guidelines rather than prescriptions. Sparse or improbably angled branches may appear to break rules—but these apparent deviations are deliberate, grounded in both craft knowledge and aesthetic judgment.


The practitioner’s skill lies in balancing perception and reality: to the viewer, the tree seems spontaneous, organic, or even contrarian; behind the appearance is decades of practice, careful pruning, and subtle management of growth. Rules in bunjin function as a language of expectation, and departures from that language become expressive precisely because the maker understands the craft deeply enough to choose when and how to bend them.




6. Bunjin as Contemporary Art Practice​


Bunjin can be appreciated as living contemporary art:


  • It is temporal, evolving across seasons and years.
  • It is interactive, engaging the viewer with line, space, and implied motion.
  • It is conceptual, conveying narrative and metaphor through form and restraint.
  • It is durational, integrating both the maker’s intervention and ongoing care into the work.

From this perspective, bunjin is not a subset of bonsai—it is a discipline of sculpture, narrative, and time-based practice.




7. Conclusion: Mastery, Restraint, and Art​


Bunjin demonstrates that art and craft are not opposed—they are complementary. Craft ensures survival, structure, and longevity. Art frames those decisions into expression, narrative, and gesture.


Its power lies not in density, ornamentation, or ostentation, but in restraint, intention, and visible judgment. Its authority comes from mastery: the practitioner knows how far the tree can be reduced, how to balance tension, and how to allow minimal elements to carry maximal expression.


Bunjin does not need art discourse to defend it, nor should it be romanticized as pure freedom. It is a proving ground for craft and art simultaneously: disciplined, expressive, and eloquent in its silence.
 
This thread is a perfect example of why Westerners (or those outside of a particular culture) will never be able to fully understand and appreciate the intricacies of an Asian culture. Make bonsai your own… as long as you are trying to define and copy foreign concepts and understanding to design your trees you will never be anything but a mimic and copycat.
 
Hmm… lots of good debate…. One thought

While searching for a meaning of a tree form modeled after trees which actually occur in nature.

In my experience would hazard to recommend one head into the interior of multiple growth forests around the world and look at the scrubby understory trees. Include species which are canopy trees but could never get enough light to grow into the canopy and have been trashed by falling detritus, snow or whatnot over the years. Then mentally bonsai each.

Thinking eventually one might comprehend what this thread is looking to put into words. That said, not sure descriptive ‘rules’ created by bonsai artists could accurately describe the multiplicity of ‘literati’ tree forms which occur in nature. At least this is what years of hiking in forests around the world tell me.

Happy New Year’s!
DSD sends
Have you ever seen what bears scratching their backs do to trees??? lol They snap off branches, rip off bark, push them over and all kinds a fun!
 
Have you ever seen what bears scratching their backs do to trees??? lol They snap off branches, rip off bark, push them over and all kinds a fun!

Yep. They can make some nice pre bonsai stock. Cougar scratch trees can also be pretty nice.

Cheers
DSD sends
 
Last edited:
Okay, I’ll be the dork. Literati in training! I always like pictures over words. 🤪

IMG_7008.jpeg
 
After a lot of thought more or less because this thread "maybe" was a response to one of my own.

It was in response to your thread, but not necessarily a response to anything you did or said. That is to say, I don't think you did or said anything controversial. The topic of literati itself just tends to spark controversy, and I wanted to set a side a space to hash that out, so it didn't gum up your progression thread.
 
Back
Top Bottom