oranjeaap
Sapling
I'm getting some mixed information from the internet. Some sources say it's a bad idea because suckers have different, usually unsuitable, growth habbits compared to the parent tree. Others say it's easier and faster to get nice trunk development from a sucker.
Well, lets find out!
Species: Ulmus glabra (click)
This idea started about 2 months ago with a 4,5m / 16ft long sucker. It had a total of 4 small branches, two near the bottom, two near the top. The diameter is 4cm (1.5 inch) all the way to the very top. No branches and no movement over about 95% of it's length... a true broomstick.
It was part of a 4m (13ft) tall hedge containing both Elm and Field Maple trees. Because it didn't really have any branches or leaves except the apex protruding from the hedge, it wasn't really contributing to the actual hedge and it was time to remove it.
I left about 50 cm (1.5 ft) of totally bare trunk, no leaves, no buds.
Two months later, it looks like this:

It's growing near a fence and it's impossible get photos from behind, but photo 1 is the proposed front anyway.
I was thinking twin trunk because I saw some potential with this branch and the taper near the base. But upon looking at this picture I realized it's not really a branch, more like a 2nd sucker fused to the main trunk, and it's ugly.


As you can see there is an explosion of growth below the chop site. If you look closely you can also see atleast a dozen buds forming on the actual chop site.

After (and before) the trunk chop there were no leaves, no buds, no nothing. Just a trunk and two little stumps.
At that time I was praying to get some backbudding and I had this chop in mind. But with this abundance of growth I think there are much better options now.
Well, lets find out!
Species: Ulmus glabra (click)
This idea started about 2 months ago with a 4,5m / 16ft long sucker. It had a total of 4 small branches, two near the bottom, two near the top. The diameter is 4cm (1.5 inch) all the way to the very top. No branches and no movement over about 95% of it's length... a true broomstick.
It was part of a 4m (13ft) tall hedge containing both Elm and Field Maple trees. Because it didn't really have any branches or leaves except the apex protruding from the hedge, it wasn't really contributing to the actual hedge and it was time to remove it.
I left about 50 cm (1.5 ft) of totally bare trunk, no leaves, no buds.
Two months later, it looks like this:

It's growing near a fence and it's impossible get photos from behind, but photo 1 is the proposed front anyway.
I was thinking twin trunk because I saw some potential with this branch and the taper near the base. But upon looking at this picture I realized it's not really a branch, more like a 2nd sucker fused to the main trunk, and it's ugly.


As you can see there is an explosion of growth below the chop site. If you look closely you can also see atleast a dozen buds forming on the actual chop site.

After (and before) the trunk chop there were no leaves, no buds, no nothing. Just a trunk and two little stumps.
At that time I was praying to get some backbudding and I had this chop in mind. But with this abundance of growth I think there are much better options now.