Bonsai Opinions...

Help me out with the math here, folks, concerning what I will henceforth label as the "Bolero Postulate" (the term Bolero's "Pustulate" having also been proposed ... )

Bolero's Private Parts' (length x width) / (His IQ + # of Noteworthy Bonsai) = ???

The answer I get is that this is equal roughly to the square root of the root mass of his decent trees, which is zero.

Have I gone wrong in my calculations here?

Obviously, and without question, e (excrement) = mc ( mucho-crapola) squared - and this is perhaps a more valid calculation of Bolero's postulate ... but then, I never really adequately solved the Schrödinger Wave Equation to the satisfaction of the Japanese - nor the Chinese - bonsai Masters, to whom I bow whenever I think .. or fantasize ... or worry, truthfully .... or even feel dismay ... despair .......... about their length x width Private Parts calculations, and the limp deadwood factor that neither these days produces interesting trees, nor offspring.
 
I don't know about anyone else ...but that made a wet spot in my pants..... and
These noteworthy "wet spots", if I calculate correctly, correspond directly to your "length x width" Private Parts calculations in a positive sense, ensuring - most likely - the production by you of interesting trees at the very least, a phenomenon unwitnessed for the most part (Kimura excepted, given his proclivities for easy women of certain foreign dark-color extractions) in Japan and China for a generation or more now.

I believe Bolero's juvenile, sub-maturational experiences in such realms negate clearly - and almost certainly - his claims, put forth in the Bolero Postulate, with it's tenuous grounding on his length x width of Private Parts calculations, divided by his IQ plus his number of noteworthy Bonsai, the results of which, as stated, are roughly equal to the square root of the root mass of his decent trees, which is clearly zero.

This should be clear by now, and I rest my case.
 
I don't know about anyone else ...but that made a wet spot in my pants.....
If you collect said wet spots (also known as angel tears) and sprinkle them sparingly on your bonsai look-alike, you can erase 10 years off the 100 year requirement. If however your tears are not pure in spirit, your tree will will receive the deadly pseudomonas and there will be no joy in mudville.
 
So can 500 years old True Bonsai be trimmed with modern scissors or would it make it look-a-like bonsai?
 
Oh, it wouldn’t be a True Bonsai because you’re watering it with modern water!

What if your water comes from a deep aquifer? There might be some hundreds of years old water in there. We should harvest it and sell bottled True Bonsai Watering Liquid™ (patent pending).
 
You all just don't get my very wise riddle until a great mind steps forward.

“Here's all you have to know about men and women: women are crazy, men are stupid. And the main reason women are crazy is that men are stupid.”
 
God helps us. We have another @bol ero in the house. We are doomed!!! There are just too many nonsense posts from bolero that taking up all the space for the real meaningful posts. I appeal to all to just ignore this dude. He won't be around long if no one interact with him.... that doesn't stop him from creating a new screen handle though.... that is my opinion.
 
You all just don't get my very wise riddle until a great mind steps forward.

“Here's all you have to know about men and women: women are crazy, men are stupid. And the main reason women are crazy is that men are stupid.”
No question some are.
 
You all just don't get my very wise riddle until a great mind steps forward.

“Here's all you have to know about men and women: women are crazy, men are stupid. And the main reason women are crazy is that men are stupid.”

The thread has so much life now, it has passed Bolero and now he wants to play. I find that comical in it's own way. Probably part of the "Pustulate".
 
Who is this Bul ero person ? is that you Smoke ? Just got back from lunch, Dickeys, best BBQ around...
 
Back
Top Bottom