The "So?" response to bonsai rules.

[jszg]

I will also add there's this very odd cultural view in America (but not, in my very limited experience, the rest of the world) that rules are ontologically "bad". But rules are not only useful, they are also objectively good, as such. Oftentimes they arose from an old consensus built by trial and error.

 

[Cajunrider]

I will also add there's this very odd cultural view in America (but not, in my very limited experience, the rest of the world) that rules are ontologically "bad". But rules are not only useful, they are also objectively good, as such. Oftentimes they arose from an old consensus built by trial and error.

I actually find the odd view is that the world thinks Americans think that rules are "ontologically 'bad'". I was an immigrant to America and have traveled to lots of places plus having friends in practically most every country in the world. A more accurate view is that Americans approach rules with a more open mind to opposing views. Yes, Americans are more likely to challenge rules but really don't automatically think they are bad. I rather think it is a healthy attitude to approach every rule with a "why" and investigate.
For me I abide with rules first to keep peace. Then I investigate on my own and make my decision when I have facts.

PS: I actually can drift so yeah, when I think a certain rule is not that good, I can go sideway faaaast.

 

[Bonsai Nut]

I will also add there's this very odd cultural view in America (but not, in my very limited experience, the rest of the world) that rules are ontologically "bad". But rules are not only useful, they are also objectively good, as such. Oftentimes they arose from an old consensus built by trial and error.

A classic saying related to this topic:

Some people learn bonsai for 20 years. Other people learn bonsai for 1 year, repeated 20 times.