I like the forms that's why. Look, don't take it personally but I never believe someone 100% that ive never had experience talking with about a particular subject. Especially if I have doubts about what they're saying. You could be 100 % right, and I'll file that little tip away for the future. Since I don't know you or why you felt the need to try to discourage someone from learning I'll just say I guess that's why you are here...so why are you here?
wtf
I hope you win just to show people that good Material is not about the Species but the potential of any material you see promises from. I would develop a four leaf clover if I thought it had great potential.
That trunk looks super cool.. don't get discouraged my man.. I see the value of the material at the very least an amazing winter profile. And yup I totally get the problem with using untested native material and Invasive Species too.i have a few mulberry clumps and bean sizes 4" to 7" trees I've been working on for one to two years. Those mulberry love to create roots that run long distance for resources. I dug one large mulberry that had roots 8" away from the trunk and my house foundation I might add!!... I have a thread about native silver maples called tell my why native silver maples suck.. I've definitely seen the negatives of native trees and why they are not used for serious tree development. But I still think they are great material nonetheless. All trees have positive and negative aspects about them its a trade off of what you see potential in. I'm from the school of thought that if I see something that makes a tree special and I can Visualize a easy Coherent design, then I'm going to use that Material no matter what species it is.
I've definitely seen the negatives of native trees and why they are not used for serious tree development. But I still think they are great material nonetheless.
I'm not sure how true that is. As a barber, if I'd had nothing but easy material to work with over the 25 years i have been cutting hair, buzz cuts, high and tights, etc, I don't think I'd have become the barber I have become. I believe tough material teaches us much more. I can take a head that looks like a basketball shaped California raisin with coarse hair and sculpt it into something far better than you could expect. It doesn't mean it can ever look as good as a smooth scalped well shaped head with great hair texture. Doing only heads that are easy, or hard, or one ethnicity type doesn't teach as much as a broad spectrum of hair types. Each has much to teach us, and a broad spectrum of hair types and difficulties teach us much more.Deviating from the standard Japanese maples and black pines brings additional complications, and it has inhibited my progress as an inexperienced bonsai grower.
I'm not sure how true that is. As a barber, if I'd had nothing but easy material to work with over the 25 years i have been cutting hair, buzz cuts, high and tights, etc, I don't think I'd have become the barber I have become.
Ah, gotcha. I caught that part as well, but thought you were saying it has held you back on skill, which I disagree with...I really like your trees you've posted. Totally agree, some tree species are a waste of time while others make bonsai look easy.That's not what I meant. I've learned a tremendous amount from experimenting with native material, but if I had chosen to start with tried and tested species, I would have some decent trees by now, and from there I could still branch out into various unusual species for something more challenging. Beginners should begin with beginner trees and then ramp up the difficulty at an even, measured pace.
Primarily, I was objecting to the assertion that all species can be good material. Some species are bad for bonsai. Black walnut is bad for bonsai. Period. That's not to say a talented grower couldn't meet the challenge and make something great with a black walnut tree, but let's not pretend that it has all the same great qualities as elm or zelkova. That degree of challenge is an insurmountable wall to a complete newbie.