Hello everybody, I’m looking to make an online purchase of a Deshojo to create a Bonsai, and I’ll be ordering online. So I won’t be able to see the actual treat you until it arrives. which pot size do you guys recommend?



Beautiful is in the eye of the beholder but I would say that a Japanese maple bonsai would probably take closer to 10 years and only then if no mistakes or problems along the way.but I will slowly except the fact to have a beautiful Deshojo bonsai, this could be 5 to 7 years in the making.
I completely concur! After more than 30 years of bonsai, JM are still the most frustrating species for me and the cultivars are even worse!!Beautiful is in the eye of the beholder but I would say that a Japanese maple bonsai would probably take closer to 10 years and only then if no mistakes or problems along the way.
Everyone seems to aspire to a Japanese maple bonsai but In my experience JM are more difficult to work with - less hardy, more prone to local thickening, slower to grow and recover after large pruning, more diseases and pests, longer internodes make it harder to get a nice, compact tree.
I would always recommend Trident maple to beginners over JM. Quicker to grow, hardier and if you have a problem cut it off and start again.
There's a reason there are so few great Japanese maple bonsai and that the few that are great are revered so highly.
An interesting take... I happen to love Japanese maples. I've also a Trident clump.Beautiful is in the eye of the beholder but I would say that a Japanese maple bonsai would probably take closer to 10 years and only then if no mistakes or problems along the way.
Everyone seems to aspire to a Japanese maple bonsai but In my experience JM are more difficult to work with - less hardy, more prone to local thickening, slower to grow and recover after large pruning, more diseases and pests, longer internodes make it harder to get a nice, compact tree.
I would always recommend Trident maple to beginners over JM. Quicker to grow, hardier and if you have a problem cut it off and start again.
There's a reason there are so few great Japanese maple bonsai and that the few that are great are revered so highly.
Really? I've this strange rule one species on my bench so they each stand out as significantly their own no two representing. So I've a huge species list. But I've broken that rule of thumb ..I've 4 J.M. I've a Trident clump...I don't hate it. I think I appreciate both for what they bring to the table.I completely concur! After more than 30 years of bonsai, JM are still the most frustrating species for me and the cultivars are even worse!!
Momiji, murasaka kiyohime, trident, mikawa yatsuba, and sango kaku.Thanks @hardtimes , if possible, upload a picture, I’d love to see it.
I also like Japanese maples. I don't have any self imposed rules on numbers so I have a number of JM bonsai here.An interesting take... I happen to love Japanese maples. I've also a Trident clump.
My old rule of thumb was one species per bench. My cultivar list is large over that stance. Over the years... I've caved on nicer material. I've now...four Japanese maples. Because...well, I do love them. They all are different in their own right. I don't see the years in to develop a tree...I see the enjoyment in the journey.
One Japanese maple...more of a project than the others. But I intend to enjoy the journey...it came...profoundly scarred on the trunk and base. I intend to enjoy the characteristic of it...and not mind if it isn't for everyone.





I always assumed the reason for more Trident seen. Is as you state. You can develop them quicker.I also like Japanese maples. I don't have any self imposed rules on numbers so I have a number of JM bonsai here.
Shohin-View attachment 513026
Larger
View attachment 513029View attachment 513028
View attachment 513027
View attachment 513030
That does not make them easier to develop or maintain. Some of the problems I alluded to earlier do not become obvious for 5-10 years then you suddenly realize you have a problem and need to figure out why and how to reverse it to recover a showable tree. Other issues are much quicker to develop.
You may have exceptional skills that make JM easier to manage. After more than 40 years I'm quite certain that JM is much harder to develop and to maintain than trident maple. After early trimming related problems appeared in my JM I spent years learning how to trim and prune more effectively on tridents (because they are so much more forgiving) then came back to JM with the improved skill levels and knowledge to develop the trees shown - and others.
There's a reason why shows have far more quality tridents on the benches than JM.
Beautiful looking tress. You have a lot of fun ahead of youMomiji, murasaka kiyohime, trident, mikawa yatsuba, and sango kaku.
They’re all new to me this year. I’ll most likely repot them all into 100% akadama in the coming spring. I’ve heard users from my area having success preventing scorching with that medium. If I can afford it that is lol. Although one thing to note is that you most likely won’t experience leaf scorching in your zone, I’m just saying that my green maple is doing the best by far which is why I said that it’s the hardiest and best looking (out of the maples that I have).