Collected chopped trees and new growth

baldone

Mame
Messages
226
Reaction score
392
Location
Georgia
USDA Zone
8b
I see a lot about choosing a new leader, but then I see collected trees that look like there are several branches growing from chop. How and why are they different and how do you choose.
multi2.jpg
 
Your choice of leader(s) completely depends on what you envision for the chopped material, as well as what happens while you're growing the material, out, as sometimes your vision will change as the material grows and develops over time. Leaders are used to grow sections of trunk, and lots of chopped material have years and years of growing on before the single main trunk has achieved the approximate size and shape to move on to the refinement phase. However, if the material might allow for a multi-trunked design, or a tree with multiple sub trunks, you'd allow multiple leaders to grow. Your example above is basically an informal upright styled with a single, short but thick trunk and multiple sub-trunks extending out to create the canopy. I suppose, if this tree was chopped, the artist could have decided on keeping a single leader/trunk and growing on from there. There really isn't a right or wrong answer. I will say that I like this tree a lot and applaud the decisions that were made to create it. Give this one another 10-15 years to thicken those sub trunks a bit and it'll look much older than it does right now.
 
I guess 'Choosing a leader' should really be 'choosing leader(s)'
A single trunk tree and most higher chops will require us to choose a single new leader (or new leader + a branch) after each chop.
Broom style is developed from several new leaders after a chop higher on the trunk.
Very low chop can result in either a single trunk tree (one new leader) or a multi trunk tree (several new leaders.

I know some would see the forks on the tree above just a little too high for a true multi trunk but I think the forks are low enough for that tree to be classed as multi trunk. Whatever style you want to label it, I agree with @Dav4 It's a really great tree. Even better for the artist choosing to work slightly outside normal style protocols.
 
Back
Top Bottom