I don’t think a planting angle or rotation of front is enough to style this tree. I also know my style isn’t for everyone. But since you seem to be mulling something over with all these photos, I’ll share my thoughts. I still think this is a tale of two trees, with a great upper trunk on top of a phone pole. The lower branches (1,2,3) are only accentuating the disconnect in my eye. 3 is useful, 4,5 are crucial, and well-located.
View attachment 361211View attachment 361212
Simply removing part of 1 isn’t enough, in fact it makes the straight trunk worse:
View attachment 361213
Removing it entirely starts to pull your eye up the trunk, to the interesting section, and into the well-placed branches.
View attachment 361214
However, branch 2 emerges to the front, and to the right, just below branch 3...so it’s redundant and poorly-located. If it’s removed:
View attachment 361215
Now the tree is starting to look almost graceful, and probably even more if you tilt the top just a bit toward the viewer. Then, and since branches on CQ grow quickly, you can develop 3 to fill in the space left by 2, and 5 to fill in space left by 1. Need to pull down 3 and 5, which can be done with guy wires.
View attachment 361217