BobbyLane
Imperial Masterpiece
... which goes to show that a "bonsai" is not the "doppelganger" of a real tree.
Here for instance, the lower branches of the tree in nature bend downward, there are many old trees I can see when I drive to work that have a similar silhouette, but on a bonsai, this would look too much, the branches would touch the ground/soil : so the structure of the tree is adapted to give "the impression of..." And it's the same for the top.
I'm neither a supporter or a proponent of the "hedge pruning" method. If I had to vote, I'd say 51% for WP, and 52% for BB - I'm a fan of both : what matters is the result one gets in the end.
Different places, different methods. Different appreciation of a "finished" bonsai (a concept, is there such a thing as a "finished bonsai" ?... )
And yes, Walter is often very blunt and definitive in his opinions, but I'm far from being the best one to criticize his way to express his opinions.
![]()
![]()
![]()
But I find some comments very disrespectful, while Bjorn argues in a very civilized way. I feel that somehow it's also a lack of respect for Bjorn because for him, I think it's not an "us against them" rhethorics, it's just a different, well-argumented opinion.
no, the plan isnt to copy every single feature. its to take the bits that are most desirable and strive to create some feeling of a tree in nature. for me thats what its about.
naturalistic isnt about creating a replica of a wild tree, its more about creating trees that look like they grew that way naturally. thats what the hedge method is geared towards.
i think on a deciduous bonsai its a bit tricky for low branches bending downward to look convincing, for me it looks better if they start from the trunk rising and then dipping by way of an internode so you get that sharp change of direction, just bending them down in an ark with wire doesnt always come off unless there's a theme or the branches have built up great girth and are the heaviest branches on the tree.