Figure 3 LITERALLY is depicted the way I showed it above.From the pictures it would appear the wiring is not properly anchored prior to the figure three used for the two branches in the crotch sections. This will contribute to the type of breakage shown as the branches easily move independently rather than as a unit.
Not certain if that is the case but I do not see a third similar diameter or heavier wire on either side of the figure 3 wiring pattern. Figure 3 is the common term used for the loop over or under at the beginning of the crotch. The picture above clearly ( post #6) shows the application of a figure three wiring pattern without a proper anchor coming from below the crotch.
Exactly, without any additional anchor to secure that portion of the wiring. Figure three by itself is only effective with small weak branching that requires very little bending. I believe that is the point I was trying to make. Without the anchor from further back in the branch it is less effective and will not provide protection for the crotch. The anchor would come from wire securing the branch prior to the bifurcation, a minimum of 1 1/2 turns extending on one side of the bifurcation. As illustrated in the attached picture that illustrates the continuation of using figure three to secure branches. generally speaking the wire from the previous branch is a bit thicker in diameter and provides a good anchor for the next piece of wire used for the next figure three that wires together two branches. My comment was that if the anchor was missing it would contribute to the issue experienced. Hope that helps if my comment was misunderstood. When figure three is properly anchored it is obvious from one side showing two wires for a distance. One is usually thicker than the other and extends from the thicker portion of the branch closer to the trunk.Figure 3 LITERALLY is depicted the way I showed it above.
Thank you