Sub Alpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa)

Cruiser

Chumono
Messages
835
Reaction score
2,058
Location
Western Washington
USDA Zone
8a
This tree was collected some years ago from USFS land in Washington. It was recently purchased from a local nursery.

At time of purchase the fir appears vigorous. Lots of bushy growth, plump glaucous needles, large buds, and inner foliage close to the trunk.

1677121967468.jpeg
1677122091850.jpeg
1677122122044.jpeg
 
Roots appear strong, yet are unevenly distributed. They were concentrated only at the top, bottom, and sides of the pot. There was a sandy, burlapped core containing no fine root growth.


1677122342121.jpeg
1677122425207.jpeg

1677122369150.jpeg
 
It was a pain to get these roots in order. It took hours of digging, combing and rinsing to get them untangled and ready to pot. There was a lower root base that got sawed off.

1677122615272.jpeg
1677122744579.jpeg
1677122811693.jpeg

The original root base that was underneath the sand.

1677122929492.jpeg
1677122992044.jpeg
 
I tried to preserve as many roots as possible. In the end perhaps 20-25% were removed.

1677123313885.jpeg

Sawing the lower root base off enabled me to count the rings and age the tree.

1677123396018.jpeg

An educated guess was made to determine the point at which the tree was collected. In theory, the rings would get wider once the tree was collected and then recovered. If it was consistently cared for..

1677123468042.jpeg
 
39 years, give or take.
27 in the mountains. 12 after collection.

1677124245282.jpeg

1677124219876.jpeg
1677124346249.jpeg
This tag seems to confirm the tree was collected in 2012.
1677124648823.jpeg
 
1677173356898.jpeg

Anderson flat. 15x15x5 inches. Potting medium is 50/50 pumice and fir bark.

I’m considering some light pruning of the ends of long branches and maybe the leader. The purpose would be to redirect more energy towards inner growth and buds. Would this be ok given the repot?
Normally I wouldn’t so soon but this tree is vigorous and I don’t want the inner foliage to get shaded out this coming grow season.
 
View attachment 473947

Anderson flat. 15x15x5 inches. Potting medium is 50/50 pumice and fir bark.

I’m considering some light pruning of the ends of long branches and maybe the leader. The purpose would be to redirect more energy towards inner growth and buds. Would this be ok given the repot?
Normally I wouldn’t so soon but this tree is vigorous and I don’t want the inner foliage to get shaded out this coming grow season.
I would retain all foliage until full recovery is evident. That way you have the most photosynthesis occurring that is possible. The species is very good with root work and usually recovers rapidly! The tree is young and has lots of time ahead for training. No point in risking it at this point. Plan to prune and wire this fall if recovery is solid.
Just an opinion. Here is mine after repot last week.IMG_1693.JPG
 
I would retain all foliage until full recovery is evident. That way you have the most photosynthesis occurring that is possible. The species is very good with root work and usually recovers rapidly! The tree is young and has lots of time ahead for training. No point in risking it at this point. Plan to prune and wire this fall if recovery is solid.
Just an opinion. Here is mine after repot last week.View attachment 473959
Thanks. When gauging recovery what are the specific criteria you look for? The formation of next years buds? New root tips poking out of drainage holes? Or is it more like the overall appearance of the tree?
 
Thanks. When gauging recovery what are the specific criteria you look for? The formation of next years buds? New root tips poking out of drainage holes? Or is it more like the overall appearance of the tree?
I watch for progression and extension of new growth with buds opening and flushing out! basically a strong growing season after repotting.
 
The tree has rooted through its Anderson flat into the lawn. It is firmly attached.

8/8: Branch ends were pruned to start building desired proportions, reinvigorate inner growth, and encourage further back budding.
30%-40% of the foliage was removed.

Current:
1691772454847.jpeg

February
1691772794482.jpeg
 
Awesome tree, thanks for the update. Also, can't thank you enough for the backdrop, I can see great effort was taken to secure us a nice photo!
 
The tree is showing signs of balsam woolly adelgid. (Adelges piceae)
Many branches have gouting. Only a few shoots have emerged.

1716571758903.jpeg
The buds at the ends of these twigs failed to fully develop and open this season.

The fir was quarantined for now.
 
Back
Top Bottom