Cable
Omono
I'm looking for some feedback so that I might learn more (n00b here).
Background: I've been interested in bonsai for at least 25 but it wasn't until recently that I started doing something about it. I organized and attended a beginner's workshop taught by a local expert. For the workshop I wanted people to have untrained trees they could work on. My bonsai guy was not thrilled with my selections. Now, granted, I approached it from the perspective that most of these plants were going to be killed by the total novices but I get what he was saying about there not being much to work with.
I'm working on putting together workshop #2 and picked out a few liners for the students to use. I took bonsai guy's advice and looked for plants we were going to throw away (I work at a plant nursery) since I agreed that plants too ugly to sell in a garden center often make good bonsai stock. However, that also meant I didn't have a lot to choose from.
Below are some pictures of what I picked and my logic for doing so. I'd like to know if I was on the right track or totally blew it. I know two of them I'm already not happy with BUT they'll work since like I said... beginners kill.
I liked the roots on this cornus alternifolia and though the trunk had some possibilities.
I thought the roots were great on this cornus florida
Amelanchier lamarkii with a nice lean and some fun roots. Apparently I'm a root man...
I may have messed up on this chionanthus virginicus. I really don't remember what I was going for when I picked it out. Maybe I liked the multiple stems?
It isn't evident in this picture but this euonymus alatus compactus already looks like a miniature tree and I liked the bark striations. I'm hoping that hint of an exposed root has more hidden below the surface.
This taxodium shawnee brave looks really rough but I liked the trunk.
This one is in better shape and I liked the trunk
You can see much of this acer p ryusen but I thought the overall shape was fun.
This ryusen has much better branching and I think both would make decent semi-cascading.
I'm concerned that the thickness of the trunk on this acer viridis doesn't leave much room for shaping but it does have a gentle curve to it already.
This viridis has a much more pronounced curve and I think it will make a nice tree one day but will probably have to be trunk chopped and not look like much at the end of the workshop. Nice roots, though.
So, did I do anything right on any of these? Do you think my bonsai guy will be happier this go-round?
Background: I've been interested in bonsai for at least 25 but it wasn't until recently that I started doing something about it. I organized and attended a beginner's workshop taught by a local expert. For the workshop I wanted people to have untrained trees they could work on. My bonsai guy was not thrilled with my selections. Now, granted, I approached it from the perspective that most of these plants were going to be killed by the total novices but I get what he was saying about there not being much to work with.
I'm working on putting together workshop #2 and picked out a few liners for the students to use. I took bonsai guy's advice and looked for plants we were going to throw away (I work at a plant nursery) since I agreed that plants too ugly to sell in a garden center often make good bonsai stock. However, that also meant I didn't have a lot to choose from.
Below are some pictures of what I picked and my logic for doing so. I'd like to know if I was on the right track or totally blew it. I know two of them I'm already not happy with BUT they'll work since like I said... beginners kill.
I liked the roots on this cornus alternifolia and though the trunk had some possibilities.
I thought the roots were great on this cornus florida
Amelanchier lamarkii with a nice lean and some fun roots. Apparently I'm a root man...
I may have messed up on this chionanthus virginicus. I really don't remember what I was going for when I picked it out. Maybe I liked the multiple stems?
It isn't evident in this picture but this euonymus alatus compactus already looks like a miniature tree and I liked the bark striations. I'm hoping that hint of an exposed root has more hidden below the surface.
This taxodium shawnee brave looks really rough but I liked the trunk.
This one is in better shape and I liked the trunk
You can see much of this acer p ryusen but I thought the overall shape was fun.
This ryusen has much better branching and I think both would make decent semi-cascading.
I'm concerned that the thickness of the trunk on this acer viridis doesn't leave much room for shaping but it does have a gentle curve to it already.
This viridis has a much more pronounced curve and I think it will make a nice tree one day but will probably have to be trunk chopped and not look like much at the end of the workshop. Nice roots, though.
So, did I do anything right on any of these? Do you think my bonsai guy will be happier this go-round?