I was surprised at the suggestion, but it made more sense as I pondered it. I almost dismissed it at first because it wasn't what I wanted to hear ...although I didn't have anything in particular in mind either. From what I remember, he mentioned that the timeframe for this path was several years shorter than getting this tree vigorous and restyled and then letting it settle in and giving it a final styling. His suggestions were primarily aimed at how he could get the most value out of the time spent with the tree. From a professional viewpoint, it makes perfect sense, but I'm not yet a professional so I don't HAVE to live in that same space right now. (Still, its valid, and VERY much under consideration right now.) He later gave me an example of a similarly styled tree. Obviously, this isn't a "virt" to overlay precisely onto my tree, but it seemed to convey his intent. You can extrapolate how much he'd keep as deadwood, but seems like most of the substantial branches could be stripped and retained as deadwood.