Your first thought is correct. Bunjin looks easy because there's not much but is actually really difficult to pull off. There's always plenty of long thin trees but very few actually end up on the show benches.After contemplating these, bunjin isn’t as easy as I imagined, or maybe I just have shit material that’s gonna take some care to bend bc although young, their semi stiff. Especially the junipers.
Makes sense. I see what you mean on that last jbp.The abrupt change in the last one makes it the only one without good potential.
Couple more up there can use some branch removal (far future) and should be done as to avoid that abrupt change.
So you are left with a nice continuously tapering line which can be worked into a nice figure.
For which, other trees should be studied, poetry, etc.
The subtle beauty of that line is the difficulty.
Sorce
Your first thought is correct. Bunjin looks easy because there's not much but is actually really difficult to pull off. There's always plenty of long thin trees but very few actually end up on the show benches.
Bunjin aka. Literati are very difficult. Yes, at first glance they appear simple, but, as you are discovering, they’re anything but simple.Very true! Any bunjin I’ve ever seen on display (YouTube not real life) is stunning and elegant. Really has my eye drawn to them lately!
I’m not sure what the point of your post was. I’m not really sure who “named” the styles of trees, but it’s just a way of categorizing them.Time to stir the pot. The different styles exist to accommodate stock which ain't never gonna fit into this or that mold. Got a tree that has grown at an angle so long as to have branches that won't ever be able to be a credible upright? Positioned properly in the right pot it's a slanted champion. Got a skinny, crooked, Too Tall Jones that won't back-bud? Magically, bunjin! Etc.
Of course, the Masters will always prove their expertise by doing things in a demo, just to prove they can. Make a straight branch into a 45° or reverse 60°, or make a crooked branch straight, or whatever, just to prove they can. Then there's the answer to the question of what to do with a "nothing at all". Chop & grow-on. Yes, the Japanese covered all the bases, and then some, and named them.
Grafting what?Why not try grafting?
It would take a few extra years, but it'll give you all the possibilities instead of just a few.
Bunjin aka. Literati are very difficult. Yes, at first glance they appear simple, but, as you are discovering, they’re anything but simple.
Part of the challenge is they are supposed to depict old trees. Really old trees. These trees will have character derived from having survived for decades or centuries of storms, droughts, floods, etc.
Trying to depict that kind of character using young material is, well, nearly impossible. Instead, you should be looking for old material with character. Or, be prepared to wait a very, very long time!
As an example, here is a JWP that has a lot of bunjin character:
View attachment 267532
I have a JWP that by coincidence happens to have a similar trunkline, and similar branch placement. So, using it as inspiration, I’ve tried to create a similar image:
View attachment 267533
I have a thread on this tree showing the work I’ve done to it over the past three or so years.
The branch angles are about the same, but my tree still doesn’t feel “old”. And that’s because of the bark. My tree is about 20 to 24 years old from an air layer, and the juvenile bark still hadn’t become flaky. When it does, I think the image will improve immensely. Until then, it’s lot a “literati”, it’s just a slant.
I believe literati is different then bunjin. The two pines you posted are definitely literati.Bunjin aka. Literati are very difficult. Yes, at first glance they appear simple, but, as you are discovering, they’re anything but simple.
Part of the challenge is they are supposed to depict old trees. Really old trees. These trees will have character derived from having survived for decades or centuries of storms, droughts, floods, etc.
Trying to depict that kind of character using young material is, well, nearly impossible. Instead, you should be looking for old material with character. Or, be prepared to wait a very, very long time!
As an example, here is a JWP that has a lot of bunjin character:
View attachment 267532
I have a JWP that by coincidence happens to have a similar trunkline, and similar branch placement. So, using it as inspiration, I’ve tried to create a similar image:
View attachment 267533
I have a thread on this tree showing the work I’ve done to it over the past three or so years.
The branch angles are about the same, but my tree still doesn’t feel “old”. And that’s because of the bark. My tree is about 20 to 24 years old from an air layer, and the juvenile bark still hadn’t become flaky. When it does, I think the image will improve immensely. Until then, it’s lot a “literati”, it’s just a slant.
The poster could graft branches onto both his pines as well as his junipers. That creates a bunch of extra opportunities.Grafting what?
It’s definitely nice to start you own trees from scratch, but like you said, you just can’t get the age.EWP, like JWP take 2 to 3 DECADES to create flaky bark.