Thanks and agreed. This was one of those impulse buys. Upon further inspection I realize the double trunk maybe isn't the best and will instead do a number of layers for future material.The layer would probably work, but a twin trunk with both trunks of the same size isn't the best.
its clear which ones were chosen to be the dominant ones early on through pruning
The examples you show have more promise than we can see in the OP photo. Guess it depends on what's above the split out of the photo. The visible portion makes them look like two straight, taperless cylinders. Might be workable, but I'd still look for better material for a twin trunk.
Thanks. This was my thought as well when I purchased the tree and it had no foliage. I'm back to layering it as a double trunk, but will do it one node lower than the red line above. This weekend is probably airlayering time, so I have a couple days to change my mind a few more times.Great so you have two trunks that have ready made leaders to taper off to and add movement. You couldnt see this? Id look to pick the two leaders that blend best together. Or have some harmony.
I think I'm in the same boat. I've got choices to make and not a lot of time to make them!This weekend is probably airlayering time, so I have a couple days to change my mind a few more times.
That would be my suggestion as well.If it were mine I would go for a clump off of this it will get rid of that straight section.
View attachment 484458
And I would take advantage of that extra thickness from the second leader and layer the remaining stalk off like so. That would give you some taper and movement in the remaining trunk.
View attachment 484460
That would be my suggestion as well.
Hmmm, I like that as well. So two layers - one to get the clump and one for a thicker single trunk. Tree may have been worth it just for the clump (I did not see that option).If it were mine I would go for a clump off of this it will get rid of that straight section.