Thank you Bonhe, I love this kind of discussion.
The reason I asked is that if the scion came from the same tree, I don't think we need to bud grafting there since you already have an axillary (lateral) bud in the node area.
Say we have created a bend earlier in the design, but the outside of the bend is not at a node, we could graft a bud to the outside where we need it. So there wouldn't be any buds at that site until we graft one there. This could solve many design errors/flaws for noobs. But both branch grafts and bud grafts might take the same amount of time, so what's the point of bud grafting...? I don't know but you could ask then why not just graft a branch there, but I feel like a bud graft would be less invasive and maybe a little easier for someone without grafting experience.
Are you talking about adventitious bud or axillary (lateral) bud? I guessing you are talking about axillary bud!
No, I'm talking about adventitious buds, basically a bud not at the place we would find a bud normally. The implications are huge if this grafted bud originally dictates and initiates growth and hormone synthesis. We could use this technique to put branches where we want, heal wounds, grow sacrifice branches for thickening, etc.
As far as conifers, the presence of regular or axillary buds is a moot point because we can dictate where the buds are located (hypothetically).
Is the node the catalyst for energy until the emerging branch can take over and start returning energy?
Which is dominate, the node or the bud?
I'm going to summon
@0soyoung because he seems to like to geek out with plant physiology like me. I'm curious on his take about which has the power, buds or nodes.